v1.14.0 — add Step 3b review workflow, unify file naming, resilient code references

- Add /plan2code-3b-review: 5-step post-implementation review with adaptive
  scope, 11 dimensions, reference-file architecture, and Plan/Apply/Verify fixes
- Unify workflow/skill file naming to single-dash (drop -- and --- conventions)
- Add Devin platform support and CLAUDE.md MANDATORY FIRST STEP template
- Guide agents to use semantic anchors over line numbers in workflow prompts
- Bump version to 1.14.0
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-23 06:58:20 -07:00
parent 8e0b1a2ab2
commit 5e48e98293
42 changed files with 3431 additions and 2542 deletions
+32 -14
View File
@@ -5,7 +5,11 @@
```
plan2code/
├── src/ # Source workflow prompts (8 markdown files)
├── src/ # Source workflow prompts (9 markdown files)
│ └── plan2code-3b-review-references/ # Reference files for review skill
│ ├── verification-protocol.md # Deep verification + confidence calibration
│ ├── dimensions.md # 11 dimensions with detailed checklists
│ └── false-positives.md # Known false-positive patterns
├── plan2code-loop/ # Autonomous loop CLI tool (Node.js/TypeScript)
│ ├── src/ # TypeScript source
│ └── dist/ # Built output (tsup)
@@ -42,22 +46,36 @@ plan2code/
| File | Step | Purpose |
|------|------|---------|
| `plan2code---init.md` | Init | Generate AGENTS.md as index + `.agents-docs/` section files (progressive discovery) |
| `plan2code---init-update.md` | Update | Update AGENTS.md with learnings; detects and routes edits to `.agents-docs/` files |
| `plan2code---quick-task.md` | 0 | Lightweight planning for small tasks |
| `plan2code-1--plan.md` | 1 | Requirements analysis & architecture |
| `plan2code-1b--revise-plan.md` | 1b | Mid-implementation revisions |
| `plan2code-2--document.md` | 2 | Create implementation specs |
| `plan2code-3--implement.md` | 3 | Execute implementation (phase by phase) |
| `plan2code-4--finalize.md` | 4 | Validate, summarize, feedback, archive (7 steps) |
| `plan2code-init.md` | Init | Generate AGENTS.md as index + `.agents-docs/` section files (progressive discovery) |
| `plan2code-init-update.md` | Update | Update AGENTS.md with learnings; detects and routes edits to `.agents-docs/` files |
| `plan2code-quick-task.md` | 0 | Lightweight planning for small tasks |
| `plan2code-1-plan.md` | 1 | Requirements analysis & architecture |
| `plan2code-1b-revise-plan.md` | 1b | Mid-implementation revisions |
| `plan2code-2-document.md` | 2 | Create implementation specs |
| `plan2code-3-implement.md` | 3 | Execute implementation (phase by phase) |
| `plan2code-3b-review.md` | 3b | Post-implementation comprehensive review |
| `plan2code-4-finalize.md` | 4 | Validate, summarize, feedback, archive (7 steps) |
## Naming Convention
Workflow files follow a strict naming pattern:
- **Utilities:** `plan2code---<name>.md` (triple dash)
- **Numbered steps:** `plan2code-<N>--<name>.md` (single dash, number, double dash)
- **Utilities:** `plan2code-<name>.md` (single dash)
- **Numbered steps:** `plan2code-<N>-<name>.md` (single dash, number, single dash)
Examples:
- `plan2code---init.md` (utility)
- `plan2code-1--plan.md` (step 1)
- `plan2code-1b--revise-plan.md` (step 1b)
- `plan2code-init.md` (utility)
- `plan2code-1-plan.md` (step 1)
- `plan2code-1b-revise-plan.md` (step 1b)
## Reference Files
Some workflows use companion reference files for depth that exceeds the 11k char limit. The orchestrator (main workflow file) loads them via `Read` directives during execution.
**Pattern:** `src/<source-filename-without-extension>-references/` (e.g., `plan2code-3b-review-references/`)
**How the installer handles them:**
- **Skill-directory platforms** (Claude Code, Agents, Crush, Devin): reference files are nested as `<skill-name>/references/`. Read paths use canonical `references/<file>.md`.
- **Flat-file platforms** (Windsurf, Cursor, Copilot, Continue): reference files are placed as a sibling directory. The installer rewrites Read paths to the sibling directory name (e.g., `plan2code-3b-review-references/<file>.md`).
- **TOML platforms** (Gemini CLI): reference files are skipped — TOML embeds content inline, so Read directives won't resolve. The orchestrator's inline fallback text covers this.
Reference files are NOT subject to the 11,000 character limit. Currently only the review workflow (Step 3b) uses this pattern — it serves as the POC for potential adoption by other workflows.